Stop asking what the ad costs. Ask what a year on air costs.

Why is it so hard to know if an ad was worth the money?

Because almost nobody divides.

A production quote arrives as a single number. $15,000. $75,000. $200,000. You approve it or you don’t, and the number sits in one quarter’s budget like a rock. Nothing on the invoice tells you the thing you actually need to know, which is how long it will still be earning.

That’s the missing operation. Not “what does this cost.” What does a year of this cost.

Run it on anything else you buy and the question answers itself. Nobody prices a building by the closing cost. Nobody buys a truck without asking how many years it runs. Advertising is the one line where a serious company will spend six figures and never once divide by time.

What does creative actually contribute?

This part is settled, and it’s the reason the division matters.

NCSolutions measured what drives an ad’s sales impact. Creative quality came in at 49%, the single largest factor, ahead of brand equity at 21%, reach at 14%, and targeting at 11%. It’s consumer-goods data, so treat the exact figure as directional for B2B. The ranking is the part that holds.

Then Advertiser Perceptions asked marketers and agencies to estimate the same thing. Their guess was about 19%.

So the industry underrates its biggest input by roughly two and a half times. Worth being precise about what that number is, because it gets misquoted: 2.5x is the size of the *misjudgment*, not a performance claim. Nobody’s creative is 2.5x better than anybody’s. The gap is between what creative does and what the people buying it think it does. The full autopsy is here

And a misjudgment that size doesn’t stay an opinion. It becomes a budget. Fund creative like it’s a fifth of the outcome and you have built a campaign that needs the media to carry it.

What does that cost in real money?

There’s a number for that. System1 and Peter Field found that emotionally flat ads need 2 to 2.6 times more media spend to achieve the same effect as ads that make people feel something.

Read that as a bill, because that’s what it is. Weak creative doesn’t fail once at the invoice. It charges a surcharge on every impression behind it, for as long as it runs. The cheap ad is a subscription.

Which means the creative line and the media line were never two budgets. They’re one budget with a dial between them. Turn the creative side down and the media side has to go up to compensate. Most B2B marketing has been turning that dial the wrong way for a decade and calling it discipline. Here’s how that happened

So what makes an ad cheap?

Not its price. Its shelf life.

Take the published market ranges from what great creative costs . Most B2B video lands between $5,000 and $25,000. Our standard Ad Suite is $75,000 on the traditional paid path, all in.

On a single-quarter view, that comparison is over before it starts. Now divide.

An Ad Suite at $75,000 that runs two years costs $37,500 a year. At three years it’s $25,000 a year, which is inside the ordinary market band for one video. Against that, a company refreshing quarterly at even $15,000 a time spends $120,000 across the same two years, in eight separate invoices, and ends up with eight ads that each had one quarter to be remembered.

Then add the dull tax to the second option, on every impression, for two years.

That’s the whole argument. We are not more expensive. We are amortized.

Why do your ads last that long?

Because they’re built that way on purpose, and the decisions that make it possible happen before the shoot.

The ads carry no product UI and minimal client branding. That sounds like a creative preference. It’s an expiry date. An ad full of interface screenshots dies the day the interface changes, and an ad wrapped in a logo treatment dies the day marketing refreshes the logo. Ours are about the viewer’s problem, so the thing that could date them mostly isn’t in the frame.

We have a client who rebranded in the middle of their suite. The ads still worked.

The other half is contractual. Talent agreements are pre-negotiated so that renewing past two years is straightforward and affordable. This is where most long-running campaigns actually die: not because the ad stopped working, but because the usage rights ran out and the renewal quote was ugly. Handling that at signature rather than at renewal is the difference between a campaign you *can* keep running and one you’d like to.

Clients run our ads two years and longer. We’ve run our own three.

Doesn’t that just mean you defend old ads?

No, and this is the honest limit on everything above.

Durable is not immortal. Performance data is the referee. If the numbers say an ad is spent, it’s spent, and we go find the next durable one. The model we’re working from is “I’m lovin’ it” — a platform you keep feeding, not a trophy you defend.

The claim isn’t that our ads run forever. It’s that they’re built so that *running* is the default and replacing is a decision, instead of replacing being the default and running being a surprise.

So how do we pay for it?

Two ways, and the right one depends on where your media budget already is.

The free path. At a media commitment of $300,000 or more, full live-action production is funded inside the media budget you were already going to spend. One budget line, both jobs. You don’t open a creative line item, you don’t fight for it, and you don’t lose it in the next round of cuts. Free means funded. It has never meant cheap. How one roof works

The paid path. Below that floor, you can buy the same work directly. An Ad Suite runs $50,000 to $100,000 all in, with $75,000 as the standard: AdSpark at $7,500 to $15,000 for creative development plus your media plan, credited toward the total, and the rest for production through delivery. At $75,000 that’s one 30-second hero, three 15-second pillars that each take a different angle rather than being cutdowns, the photography, and social versions with and without subtitles sized for every platform.

Same end product either way. The difference is which budget it comes out of.

And if neither is where you are right now, the pieces are available on their own — creative development, production, or a media plan — so the first step doesn’t have to be the whole system.

Whichever door you come through, the division is the same. Take the number, divide it by the years it stays on air, and compare that against what you’re spending now to keep replacing something that never got the chance to be remembered.

See the work See our process

Frequently asked questions